The Yourgene® DPYD assay has receieved IVDR certification!
A product with IVDR certification enables clinician and patient confidence in a higher quality test - where accuracy matters
View our IVDR certification here.

The Yourgene® DPYD assay allows for rapid detection of the 6 clinically relevant variants in the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) enzyme.
Identification of individuals with DPD deficiency prior to commencing treatment is critical to avoid adverse reactions to chemotherapeutic agents which can be severe, and even fatal.
What is DPYD?
5-fluoracil (5-FU) is a chemotherapy agent belonging to the fluoropyrimidine family, often used to treat a range of cancers including: colorectal, head and neck, breast, pancreatic and stomach cancer. 5-FU is metabolized by the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase enzyme (DPD) which is encoded by the DPYD gene.
Several variants within the DPYD gene have been described that lead to decreased DPD activity, or complete loss of function. Patients with these variants are at an increased risk of severe or fatal 5-FU toxicity. Therefore, implementation of DPD deficiency screening by genotyping will allow a more accurate prediction of toxicity and chemotherapeutic response, enabling the appropriate treatment to be offered to patients.
CPIC Guidelines for DPYD
The Clinical Pharmacogenetics Consortium (CPIC) guidelines for DPYD genotyping recommend testing for the 6 clinically relevant variants outlined below:
rs56038477
rs56276561
c.1236G>A
c.483+18G>A
p.E412E
N/A
Decreased
Decreased
Yourgene® DPYD assay
The method employed by the DPYD assay uses fluorescent ARMS (Amplification Refractory Mutation System) allele specific amplification technology, which detects point mutations, insertions or deletions in DNA.
Learn more about ARMS technology here.
The Yourgene® DPYD assay is available as a CE-marked in vitro diagnostic product (IVDR) or Research Use Only (RUO) product.
For further information, please see our Product Menu.
Yourgene® DPYD previously known as Elucigene® DPYD.
The DPYD test is two tube assay which is easy to set up and involves minimal hands-on time. Results review and interpretation is simple with no data transfer required. The rapid 4-hour workflow allows the test to be incorporated into routine cancer care treatment pathways.
Test Highlights

Two tube assay

Ready to use reagents

Simple data interpretation

Fast turnaround time

In line with CPIC Guidelines
DPYD Test Features

One PCR
- One or two tube analysis
- Tube A: Mutation Detection
- Tube B: Wildtype Detection
- Simple PCR set-up
- Reduced hands on time

One Analysis
- No post-PCR manipulation
- Compatible with ABI 3*** and SeqStudio Genetic Analysers
- Highly multiplexed 5 dye chemistry
- Rapid Analysis

One Report
- GeneMarker® and GeneMapper™ software applications
- Easy data review and analysis
- Informative single page reporting
- No data transfer required

Accuracy
Accuracy was determined to be 100% positive percent agreement (PPA), 100% negative percent agreement (NPA), and 100% overall agreement (OA) compared to Sanger sequencing Accuracy of the DPYD assay was assessed by evaluating 103 samples representing a wide variety of gene variants from four separate sources.
Repeatability
Repeatability results showed 100% PPA, 100% NPA, and 100% OA. This data provides evidence that the DPYD assay produces consistently repeatable results.


Reproducibility
Reproducibility results showed 100% PPA, 100% NPA, and 100% OA. This data provides evidence that the DPYD assay produces consistently reproducible results.
DPYD Genotyping test results can guide personalised medicine regimes for individual patients, based on therapy dose adjustments - enabling safe treatment choices for all patients.
Yourgene's latest articles outline the importance of DPYD testing in oncology, the clinical and health economic benefits and global adoption of DPYD genotyping.
View the full articles below
What is precision medicine?
What is Precision Medicine? Precision medicine (sometimes called “personalised medicine”) is the branch of genetics concerned with optimising treatment based on an individual’s genetic attributes. In contrast to historical practices in which a one-size-fits-all approach was pursued, precision medicine “considers variability in genes, environment, and lifestyle to direct disease treatment and prevention, more accurately predicting which treatment and prevention strategies will work best for a particular patient.” - NHS Transformation Directorate, Aug 2020. Pharmacogenomics (PGx) is pivotal to precision medicine, concerned with “optimising therapeutic efficacy whilst reducing the likelihood of severe adverse toxicity events (SATEs).” - FDA, August 2023. DPYD is a real-life example of pharmacogenetic testing where a negative response to therapy can be predicted, and a safe directive towards reduced dosage or alternate therapy made. An estimated 3-8% of the global population has a DPYD mutation which places them in an "at risk" category for a SATE to a widely prescribed class of chemotherapy agents called fluropyrimidines (e.g. 5-fluoracil/5-FU, capecitabine, tegafur). In this series, we shine a light on DPYD screening, and the ways that Yourgene DPYD could improve health outcomes for hundreds of thousands of cancer patients every year.DPYD genotyping to prevent chemotoxicity - precision medicine in action
Why is DPYD important in the context of oncology?
The metabolism of a class of drugs called fluropyrimidines (e.g., 5-fluoracil/5-FU, capecitabine, tegafur) is performed by the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) enzyme, encoded by the DPYD gene. An estimated two million 5-FU prescriptions are written globally each year for a variety of cancers, including colorectal, head and neck, breast, pancreatic and stomach cancer. Whilst treatment with 5-FU is generally well tolerated, variants in the DPYD gene cause reduced efficiency in the breakdown of 5-FU. When 5-FU levels are sufficiently high, cytotoxic symptoms begin to arise including diarrhoea, stomatitis, neutropenia, hyperbilirubinemia, and hand-foot syndrome. Identifying patients with DPD deficiency prior to commencing chemotherapy treatment with 5-FU therapy is critical to avoid adverse reactions, as patients with these variants are at an increased risk of severe or fatal 5-FU toxicity. DPYD Genotyping test results can guide personalised medicine regimes for individual patients, based on therapy dose adjustments - enabling safe treatment choices for all patientsWhy is DPYD important in the context of oncology?
Clinical Justification for DPYD genotyping
An estimated 3–8% of the global population has a DPYD mutation which places them in an "at risk" category for a severe adverse toxicity event (SATE). Effects of 5-FU toxicity are so severe as to be fatal in approximately 1% of patients treated with 5-FU. This means that an estimated 60,000–160,000 individuals every year are at risk of being killed by their treatment, rather than their disease. In December 2013 the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) published their “Guideline for Fluoropyrimidines and DPYD”. The guidelines identify six clinically actionable DPYD variants as well as outlining a dose-reduction framework, to direct safe treatment for patients with these variants. Implementation of DPD deficiency screening by genotyping allows a more accurate prediction of toxicity and chemotherapeutic response. Various international medical authorities have built on CPIC’s recommendations since they were published. On 30th April 2020, the European Medicines Agency recommended patients should be tested for the lack of DPD before starting cancer treatment with 5-FU medicines. Leading scientific groups, such the Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group, also provided updated gene and drug clinical practice guidelines accordingly. These recommendations, as well as the availability of DPYD assays, have permitted genotyping to be adopted into clinical practice in many countries. The clincial impact of DPYD testing is saving patients’ lives. Be part of the personalised medicine movement and introduce DPYD screening for your patients.Clinical Justification for DPYD genotyping
Financial Motivation for DPYD genotyping
Thanks to recommendations made by organisations including CPIC, the FDA and European Medical Agency, as well as the availability of affordable commercial DPYD genotyping assays, severe adverse toxicity events and deaths due to 5-FU therapy are entirely preventable. In May 2022, Oregon Health & Science University promised to change an aspect of its cancer treatment and pay out $1 million to settle a lawsuit claiming the university’s negligence killed a cancer patient, David McIntyre. The university did not disclose the risk of the genetic condition to Mr. McIntyre that led to his severe adverse reaction to his chemotherapy, nor that it can be tested for. Although testing for the genetic condition isn’t standard practice in the USA, OHSU will now include education [on DPD Deficiency] in its Oncology Fellowship program. As part of the settlement, the university’s oncologists will now be required to tell patients about [DPD Deficiency] before initiating the chemotherapy drug capecitabine. Read the OHSU article here: https://hubs.la/Q025rLnX0 Furthermore, “Zero severe toxicity events [have been] reported since the programme was rolled out. A night in ICU can cost £6,000 and patients with severe toxicity can spend up to six weeks in ICU; therefore, DPYD testing will have a massive impact on the NHS’ budget.” Cara Thomas, Pre-registration Clinical Scientist, AWMGS Health Economics impact of adopting DPYD genotyping into your patient pathway The cost of DPYD genotyping is minimal compared with the financial and health cost burden of prescribing a treatment that will have a chemotoxic reaction, as a result of not performing the simple screening test prior to 5-FU chemotherapy.Financial Motivation for DPYD genotyping
Trends in global adoption of DPYD genotyping
Research on heritable DNA variation in DPYD has provided a wide range of knowledge, from in vitro function of genetic variants to cost evaluation of genetic testing in the clinic. Widespread adoption of DPYD testing has been facilitated by the publication of guidelines, ministry recommendations and government reimbursement provisions. Since CPIC’s first guidance in 2013, implementation of DPYD testing at the local, regional and national level has commenced in earnest. In 2019 Yourgene Health brought the Yourgene® DPYD assay to market and have seen its uptake grow in real-time – first across the UK and Europe, and now reaching 21 countries as far as Northern America, South Africa and Australasia. To reach an informed decision about implementation, practicing oncologists need access to concise information on the genetic variants to be tested and interpretation of the test results. The American Journal of Clinical Oncology (AJCO) recommend that practicing oncologists familiarise themselves with the subject of DPD deficiency and its clinical implications by using their practitioner-friendly guide, before they search for more specialised information from other sources. DPYD genotyping for 5-FU toxicity has been adopted in many countries internationally.Trends in global adoption of DPYD genotyping
As a result, testing has been introduced into cancer care clinical pathways following government reimbursement.

Patient and Healthcare Provider views on DPD deficiency screening
Dr Gabriel Brooks (GB) is a Medical Oncologist specialising in treating gastrointestinal cancers at Darmouth-Hitchcock Medical Centre. He has a specialist interest in DPD deficiency and cancer care delivery research.
Holly Ellis (HE) and Hannah Stevens (HS) are both scientists working in Genomics in the NHS. They have both been involved in establishing and running a DPYD testing service at the hospital for routine testing of patients undertaking chemotherapy. Holly is also known on social media as ‘The Scouse Scientist’. In this role she aims to break stereotypes in science, as well as educate and inform the general public on issues such as the use of genomics in precision medicine.
IVDR FAQs
Yourgene are committed to sharing our IVDR expertise with our distribution partners and end users – we will be bringing you informative content to help guide you through your IVDR fears.
View the full articles below
Summary of IVDR Scope and Key Dates
The European Union In Vitro Diagnostics Regulation 2017/746 (EU IVDR) expanded upon IVD Directive 98/79/EC (IVD-D) requirements, which have been in effect since 1998. The changes come into effect immediately, without having to be implemented into the respective states’ laws. Whilst some things, like the number of risk device classes, are remaining the same, the scope of the IVDR changes are wide reaching, with key changes as follows: The intention of the regulation is to set tighter and broader requirements for the quality, performance and safety of IVD products, with implications for both manufacturers and consumers. Learn more about Yourgene's IVDR timeline on our Quality section of our website. Yourgene are committed to sharing our IVDR expertise with our distribution partners and end users – we will be bringing you informative content to help guide you through your IVDR fears. If you have any questions about IVDR, please contact dpyd@yourgenehealth.com to speak with an expert.Summary of IVDR Scope and Key Dates
Who is affected by IVDR?

Who is affected by IVDR?
The reach of The European Union In Vitro Diagnostics Regulation 2017/746 (EU IVDR) extends to all EU member states, plus all European Free Trade Association States and EEA territories, with implications for both manufacturers and consumers.
Regulatory requirements will be more demanding under the IVDR for all IVD devices, but the need to prove compliance to a notified body prior to CE marking will increase the burden on the manufacturers and result in a higher cost of regulatory compliance.
The strengthened requirements are all intended to reduce risk, for both users and patients. To this end, devices continue to be certified by an appointed Notified Body (NB) according to risk class (See graphic below)
“In some cases, it may not be possible to generate adequate proof of compliance with the new requirements. These factors may result in some devices no longer being commercially viable.” - BSI Medical Device White Paper Series, Explaining IVD classification issues.
If you have any questions about IVDR, please contact dpyd@yourgenehealth.com

What does IVDR mean for me?
The EU IVDR holds manufacturers of in vitro diagnostic devices (IVDs) to a higher standard. Conformity assessment requirements of IVDR specify that manufacturers must provide, among other things, considerable evidence of scientific validity, as well as data demonstrating analytical and clinical performance of the devices. Because of this, there are also implications for users of IVDs, and significant requirements for labs who develop and run their own “in-house devices” as part of workflows intended for clinical use. Users of laboratory-developed tests (LDTs) who wish to continue to do so beyond the May 2028 deadline will be required to prove that their home-brew test(s) fulfil Article 5(5) requirements, which briefly state: - Experience from clinical use regularly reviewed and corrective action taken if necessary To summarise, if a laboratory intends to continue using their own LDT, they adopt the role of a manufacturer and must undertake the onerous task of compiling the relevant data. If you have any IVDR questions, please contact dpyd@yourgenehealth.com to speak to an expertWhat does IVDR mean for me?
- Information (including justification of manufacture, modification and use) is available on request to the competent authority
- Specific needs of the target patient group cannot be met to an appropriate level of performance by a commercially available CE-IVD
- Device cannot be made on an industrial scale, or transferred outside of the health institution
- Device manufacture/use occurs under an appropriate Quality Management System
- Device meets general safety and performance requirements set out in Annex I
- Laboratory is compliant with ISO:15189 (or equivalent) standard
Why is the IVDR timeline so long?
Under the European Union In Vitro Diagnostics Directive 98/79/EC (IVD-D), approximately 8% of IVDs required Notified Body involvement. Under European Union In Vitro Diagnostics Regulation 2017/746 (EU IVDR), approximately 80% of IVDs require Notified Body involvement. Given that there are 34,000 companies within the European medical device sector, and only 36 designated notified bodies for IVDR, the limited capacity of the notified bodies plus a slower than expected uptake and recognition of the regulation has contributed to the protracted timelines of the transition to this point. If you have any questions about IVDR, please contact dpyd@yourgenehealth.com to speak to an expertWhy is the IVDR timeline so long?
What does IVDR status mean?
A product with IVDR certification enables clinician and patient confidence in a superior high quality test - where accuracy matters Yourgene DPYD: One of the first examples of an IVDR pharmacogenomics test that will continue to have a positive impact on cancer patients’ livesWhat does IVDR status mean?

A Quality & Regulatory perspective on IVDR
In this edition of Your Expert, Yourgene’s Head of Quality Assurance and Regulatory Affairs (QA/RA) Claire Ryan shines a light on the European Union In Vitro Diagnostics Regulation 2017/746 (EU IVDR) to de-mystify some of the remaining questions around the changes, what it means for Yourgene Health and the impact on their current IVD users.
Videos
An introduction to DPYD genotyping
Global adoption of DPYD genotyping
Video and testimonial from Louise Brown, founder of 5FU Alliance.
Interpretation of DPYD testing results by Holly Ellis, The Scouse Scientist.

"It is clear that testing has a key role to play in managing a successful response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Alongside continuing to support initiatives that foster a robust viral testing and tracing programme, Governments across the world should look to examples of where other testing, such as DPYD screening, is being used innovatively to reduce the burden on resources of critical importance during the pandemic. "
View the full Your Comment articles below
The role of DPYD testing in managing a successful response to the COVID-19 pandemic - 5 November 2020
The role of DPYD testing in managing a successful response to the COVID-19 pandemic – 5 November 2020
Since the beginning of the global COVID-19 outbreak, the diagnostic and research community has undertaken an unprecedented effort to understand how best to manage, eradicate and prevent the disease. Two key pillars in the fight against the pandemic are establishing a robust testing strategy and implementing procedures and processes to reduce the burden on healthcare systems.
Independent SAGE recently published a document containing core recommendations for how best to optimize and develop the current testing environment (1). It is clear that a wider reaching, more efficient testing strategy is desperately needed – in the UK Baroness Harding (head of NHS Test and Trace) recently briefed the science and technology committee that the number of individuals looking to book a test was three to four times the capacity of the service (2). Outside of the centralised testing systems employed by most Governments across the world, many businesses keen to bring staff back into the workplace have turned to private health companies to meet demand. Other sectors, including universities and independent schools, have also contributed to demand for private testing being thirty times higher than that seen in the summer (3). Facilities have responded in kind, with some creating ‘pop up’ facilities to facilitate the collecting and processing of extra samples (3). Manufacturers of testing kits have also responded by focusing efforts on maximising the ease and efficiency of testing. One area of innovation has been optimising saliva testing in order to move away from the need for nasopharyngeal swabs, which is labour intensive and usually requires close contact with a healthcare professional.
Despite the collective effort of both the public and private healthcare sectors to increase capacity and develop the testing pathway, diagnosing and identifying cases remains only one of the pillars needed to protect communities and manage the pandemic.
At the onset of the pandemic countries across the world put in place national initiatives to increase the number of available hospital beds and associated staffing resource. Leishenshan Hospital in Wuhan was one of the hospitals built by China in order to handle the large number of COVID-19 patients. The hospital was built in a record time of just 2 weeks, whilst in the UK 7 critical care hospitals were opened in the space of just over a month.
Alongside such efforts to expand capacity, healthcare systems have worked to reduce the burden on resources – in particular the demand for intensive care unit (ICU) beds. In many countries the public were asked to stay at home except where absolutely necessary, such as to buy food or care for a vulnerable family member. This not only reduced the spread of COVID-19, but also reduced the number of accidents that are associated with travel. In the Tarragona province of Spain the number of traffic accidents fell by almost 75% (4). Difficult decisions were made around prioritising ICU beds and treatment for those critically ill patients who were most likely to benefit from such intervention (5). However, arguably the intervention with the largest impact was many hospitals making the decision to downscale all out-patient clinics and non-urgent interventions and surgeries. Policies were clear, however, that all cancer treatments and other clinically urgent care should continue unaffected (6).
This raises the question as to whether there are available strategies that could be implemented to reduce the need for intensive care escalation among patients undergoing cancer treatments or other urgent interventions. Fluorouracil (5-FU) and Capecitabine, a prodrug of 5-FU, are fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy agents used in the treatment of cancer. These drugs form a key component of the chemotherapy regime for colorectal, breast, heapato-pancreato-biliary and many other cancers. These drugs are catabolised by the dihydropyrimadine deyhydrogenase (DPD) enzyme, itself encoded by the DPYD gene. Approximately 3–5% of the European population have a partial DPD enzyme deficiency due to a mutation in the gene (7), and complete enzyme deficiency has also been described. In the US it is reported that up to 8% of the general population have at least a partial deficiency (8). Individuals with a complete deficiency are at risk of life threatening or even fatal chemotherapy toxicity when given 5-FU or Capecitabine. Those with a partial deficiency usually experience gastrointestinal adverse reactions such as prolonged vomiting, as well as haematological effects including a decreased white blood cell count when given therapy at the standard dose. The latter puts patients at risk of serious infection, and a fever is often also reported in those with a partial deficiency. Some studies have shown that almost 25% of patients who are given fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy as a first-line drug experience severe toxicity (9). DPYD testing allows for those with a partial or complete deficiency to be identified, and either a modified dose or alternative therapy given to prevent such adverse reactions. In addition to the clear clinical benefit for the patient, a recent study reported that the average cost of an ICU admission following DPYD toxicity was almost €47,000 per person, and as such that pre-emptive DPYD screening of all patients is a cost-effective strategy (9). Many countries are beginning to recognise the clinical and economic benefit of universal pre-emptive DPYD genotyping. Wales is the first nation in the UK to offer the DPYD test to all patients, with over 400 samples already taken and 6% of patients returning a positive result. All Wales Medical Genomics Service (AWMGS) commenced a pilot phase earlier this year using the Elucigene DPYD assay, which then led to the launch of the nation-wide service (10). Similarly the German Federal Joint Committee, G-BA, the national reimbursement authority in Germany, recently approved reimbursement for DPYD testing across the country. Many countries could benefit from adopting similar approaches, especially in the current climate of extra pressure on ICU resources.
It is clear that testing has a key role to play in managing a successful response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Alongside continuing to support initiatives that foster a robust viral testing and tracing programme, Governments across the world should look to examples of where other testing, such as DPYD screening, is being used innovatively to reduce the burden on resources of critical importance during the pandemic.
Click here to find out how Yourgene Health can support your organisation in delivering COVID testing. You can also find out how about our range of genotyping tests, including our CE-marked DPYD assay.
1. Independent SAGE: The complexities of testing for COVID-19: the why, the who and the how https://www.independentsage.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Indie-SAGE-testing-document-Final-110920-12.05.pdf
2. Coronavirus: Test demand ‘significantly outstripping’ capacity https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-54194302
3. Private groups race to meet Covid testing demand from UK companies https://www.ft.com/content/17c5a06e-7987-415f-ad60-78102535a12f
4. COVID-19 lockdown and reduction of traffic accidents in Tarragona province, Spain https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590198220301299
5. Prioritisation of ICU treatments for critically ill patients in a COVID-19 pandemic with scarce resources https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7230138/
6. Covid-19: all non-urgent elective surgery is suspended for at least three months in England https://www.bmj.com/content/368/bmj.m1106
7. DPYD Testing – Manchester University https://mft.nhs.uk/dpyd/
8. Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency https://rarediseases.info.nih.gov/diseases/19/dihydropyrimidine-dehydrogenase-deficiency
9. Cost Implications of Reactive Versus Prospective Testing for Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Deficiency in Patients With Colorectal Cancer: A Single-Institution Experience https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6168732/
10. Elucigene DPYD tests to be used routinely in Wales https://www.yourgene-health.com/about/press-releases/20-news/1702-12-october-2020-elucigene-dpyd-tests-to-be-used-routinely-in-wales
DPYD Guidelines and Press Releases

DPYD screening recommended in Spain

Contract Award for the supply of DPYD testing kits to NHS Wales

DPYD screening recommended in Belgium

DPYD kits recommended by NHS England

DPYD tests to be used routinely in Wales

DPD reimbursement in Germany
NHS England – Clinical Commissioning Urgent Policy Statement

Clinical Pharmacogenetics Consortium (CPIC) guidelines for DPYD genotyping
Current Customer Contact Form
New Enquiry Contact Form
For current customers and distributors seeking access to product information including IFU’s, Software Analysis Files, Safety Data Sheets and Supplementary Information please login here
If you require a login please email marketing@yourgenehealth.com